NextGen Aircraft Impact Assessments – what’s happening.

Over the next few weeks development work is being undertaken to provide even more insight and free content regarding all things postcode and Aircraft noise.

The new algorithms, visualisations and Web Site implementation rollout is as follows.

DescriptionPlanned dateStatus
Removal of all references to pre-covid 2019 datasets.
Full Assessments referring to 93 days in 2019 will be replaced with 31 Day Assessment for August 2023. This is because aircraft traffic has recovered to pre COVID levels.

All new Full Assessment requests will now analyse August 2023 aircraft movements against the current 31 day period.
Mid of Apr’24LIVE
Introduction of the 2 minute Aircraft Postcode Assessment. The 2 minute Postcode Assessment is a free of charge offering that informs the requestor the probability of a pre-Assessed postcode being impacted by aircraft noise both at night, i.e. sleep disturbance, and during the day, i.e. loss of amenity.Mid May’24LIVE
Upgrade to the Free Assessment Content page to include the 2 Minute Assessment option.End May’24LIVE
Upgrade to the Interactive Visualisation to include the results from the 2 Minute AssessmentMid Jun’24DESIGN

UK Airport Arrivals and Departure volumes by week.

The following are our latest Arrivals and Departure counts by week for a selection of Airports. The list of Airports monitored can be expanded by sending your request to The table is updated and extended on Tuesdays.

Baseline for 2019: The weekly Arrival and Departure activity for w/e 14th-April.

AirportCount of Arrivals + Departures

UK Gov. petition – Introduction and Background.

We have a collective responsibility to take ownership of how our postcode airspace is being overflown by the aviation industry.  Please do not assume there are existing laws to protect us, there aren’t.  This UK petition will provide us with a firm footing from which to launch further initiatives relating to the management of aircraft noise and emissions and to achieve that we need public access to the facts. Let’s help make the aviation industry both accountable and responsible and prevent them from chasing us out from our homes and communities.

As UK airports expand the number of domestic and international flights will also increase but at a proportionately faster rate.  As a result, more and more of our home, workplaces, schools and open spaces i.e. Postcodes, are being overflown by multiple aircraft at lower altitudes en-route to their target destination.  This has become a UK nationwide issue that is touching millions of people’s lives in terms of noise and emissions and it’s getting worse, but why?

As UK airports expand the number of domestic and international flights will also increase but at a proportionately faster rate.  As a result, more and more of our home, workplaces, schools and open spaces i.e. Postcodes, are being overflown by multiple aircraft at lower altitudes en-route to their target destination.  This has become a UK nationwide issue that is touching millions of people’s lives in terms of noise and emissions and it’s getting worse, but why?

The actual route taken by a flight considers multiple factors, such as the plane’s altitude, speed, load, proximity to the airport and where it needs to be at a point-in-time.  Every flight route over the UK mainland is determined not by the airports or airlines but by Air Traffic Controllers, who take their instruction from a government owned body called NATs.   

But the routing models used by NATs are not required to include the effects of aircraft noise and noise aggregation or engine emissions by postcode.  The reason is simple, Aviation is exempt from our Noise and Environment Acts i.e., there is no legal obligation for NATs to consider noise or emissions by postcode when designing or amending flight routes and patterns.

So how bad is the problem?  The answer is there is no official answer.  No government agency is required to collect or share flight activity by postcode.  However, individual researchers like myself together with many Aircraft Campaign groups have recorded evidence that shows that hundreds of UK postcodes are subject to clusters of 9+ planes per hour, at differing altitudes and often with only a few minutes of separation.  Result: a continuous wall of noise, vibration and potentially pollutants such as Carbon dioxide, Carbon monoxide, Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter such as soot.

As represented by the yellow, amber and red map-pins many of the impacted postcodes are 20-35 miles out from the metropolitan cities and from the airports but the situation is often even more congested for hundreds of postcodes within cities such as London.  Remember, the noise and emissions from an aircraft passing overhead will last 40-60 seconds when the flight is below 26k feet.  Additionally, 50% of the flights are early morning from 4:00am, or late evening past 9:00pm, but always on a Saturday and Sunday.  When have you ever been consulted about any of this?

How will knowing the flight activity numbers by postcode help?  The official flight numbers will enable all of us to understand the scale and occurrences of overflying by postcode, which, if not controlled, will impact on sleep patterns, wellbeing and general health of all our families.  Additionally, the same data can be used by the next generation of noise and emission models (algorithms) to determine the “best” routes through our airspace. 

What if flight activity volumes numbers are not provided?  The overflying of postcodes will remain uncontrolled, and no doubt get worse as the further demand for flights is satisfied through the introduction of new flight direct descent technologies.  These same technologies are also designed to support the introduction of electrical passenger drones and other low level flying devices.

The requirement to publish monthly flight activity by UK postcode is simple, not onerous and is very do-able.  It does not require changes to our existing laws but it will provide much needed insight into the operational management of our airspace that exists above our homes, open spaces and communities. 

By sharing flight activity numbers will it not impact local house prices?  The reasons for living or moving into a postcode area are complex and aircraft noise and emissions are only one of the many lifestyle factors and priorities considered.  Also, like road noise, people have different levels of tolerance.  So, for these reasons, we do not think house prices will be impacted by having postcode aircraft activity published on a regular basis.  It is more likely to have  a positive effect on house prices as people will be given the opportunity and information to actively protect their postcode communities from the Aviation industry and also the confidence to further invest in their properties.

It all sounds very sensible where do I sign?  We need 100k signatures from across the nation to either mobilise the UK Government or to encourage one of the major political parties to adopt this requirement within their party ‘s manifesto. 

This requirement is beyond the remit of your local MPs and it is also too big for any of the airport owners or airlines.  Therefore, it’s up to us UK citizens to take ownership and drive through this proposal.

This is your petition so please do sign by clicking on the link and then we can start leading the conversation on how our airspace could and should be managed by our appointed Aviation agents.  If you have further questions, then please email me at

Extracts from “The Mayor’s Ambient Noise Strategy- Mar-2004”

4C.2 Aircraft noise is a particularly difficult issue for London, given the location
of one of the world’s busiest airports, and a key UK global gateway, on its
western edge. With the prevailing wind direction from the west, this means
that most aircraft descending to land at Heathrow Airport approach over
the city. Aircraft using other airports, including outside the city, also pass
over London. Many Londoners are concerned about aircraft noise.

4C.6 The Mayor’s Transport Strategy recognises that provision of adequate
airport capacity to meet London’s needs, as a world city and the
international gateway to the UK, is important. However, London’s
environment also needs to be protected (Transport Strategy, Policy 4L.1).
Noise is, of course, one of the key environmental issues for air transport,
along with air quality, and, increasingly, greenhouse gas emissions. The
120 Mayor of London The Mayor’s Ambient Noise Strategy
The Mayor’s Ambient Noise Strategy Mayor of London 121
Mayor has stated that he supports ending the exemption of aviation fuel
from taxation to help reduce unnecessary air journeys (Transport Strategy,
paragraph 4L.12). However, reduction in general demand for air travel
would not automatically be expressed in equivalent reductions in demand
at a particular airport that was more popular and accessible to travellers
than other airports; general and location-specific noise management
would still be needed.

4C.11 After the 2002 Chapter 2 phase-out, there is no immediate prospect of a
technological advance giving a similar reduction to that achieved through
introduction of high by-pass engines.15 The 2001 ICAO decision on a new
Chapter 4 aircraft noise standard did not secure the degree of
improvement many had pressed for. European negotiators seeking quieter
aircraft at ICAO were outvoted by those from other parts of the world
whose priority was cheaper aircraft. The ICAO decision effectively pushes
the onus onto regulators, airport operators and land use planners in
countries where noise sensitive airports are located.

4C.12 A Government-commissioned study of aviation technology futures16 made
it clear that significant further progress on noise reduction would only be
implemented if regulatory agencies created the right framework. The life
of an airframe may be forty years, compared with around ten for a road
vehicle, so the impact of quieter new aircraft on overall noise levels will
be slow unless instruments, such as higher landing charges at more noisesensitive airports, higher fuel prices,
incentives for scrapping, or other
measures are used to encourage removal of those aircraft which are more
polluting and/or less fuel efficient.

4C.13 Reductions in aircraft noise at take-off, dominated by engine noise, have
been more significant than when landing. Noise from aerodynamic
sources, from the airframe, such as control surfaces, and undercarriage,
has been becoming more significant. Landing noise is more complex to
control. With construction of Heathrow Terminal 5, increases in the
proportion of larger aircraft can be expected. Increases in perceived noise
under the final approach glidepaths east of Heathrow Airport are likely.
Airlines can be encouraged to use quieter aircraft through landing fees. At
Heathrow, differential landing charges are applied. In 2000/2001, Chapter
2 aircraft (see glossary) were required to pay double the landing fee,
compared with Chapter 3. The noisiest Chapter 3 aircraft paid 10% more,
and the quietest 10% less. A supplementary noise quota system is
operated at night to encourage the use of quieter aircraft.

4C.15 Take-off noise has traditionally been seen as of greater concern than
landing noise. Take-off has been where the main improvements in aircraft
technology, principally from reducing engine noise, have been made. The
‘noise footprint’ at take-off has been significantly reduced, as modern
aircraft are able to climb much more steeply. At Heathrow, complaints
about departure noise have fallen considerably.

4C.18 Most complaints about noise associated with Heathrow now concern
aircraft coming in to land. At Heathrow aircraft continue to need to
approach at a standard 3 degree glideslope. London City Airport, with
specific obstacle clearance requirements, is exceptional in being limited to
use by aircraft which can approach more steeply. Steeper approach
reduces the area affected, but would be demanding for some aircraft
types (some would require special certification), and steeper approach
procedures are only permitted under international procedure design
criteria (PANS-OPS) for the purpose of obstacle clearance. Aircraft are
required to join the glide path (see glossary) at or above 2,500 feet in
daytime, and 3,000 feet at night. When aircraft are approaching towards
The Mayor’s Ambient Noise Strategy Mayor of London 127
the west (the predominant mode of operation at Heathrow) the
glideslope may extend across London as far as Greenwich.

4C.19 Much of the noise produced during descent to landing is aerodynamic,
including from flaps and undercarriage. An ANMAC study (see glossary)
concluded that specific measured arrivals noise limits were not practicable.
Regular monitoring and reporting of approach noise and close working
between the airport operator, airlines and air traffic control are all
necessary to achieve improvements. Continuous Descent Approach (CDA)
is a noise abatement technique for arriving aircraft which avoids the higher
noise levels generated when aircraft descend in steps (see glossary). At
Heathrow, CDA achievement during the 2300 to 0600 period improved
from 73% in the second quarter of 1999 to 88% in the third quarter of

  1. The airport operator has a target to increase this to 90% of arrivals
    by December 2004.18 A Code of Practice has been developed to reduce
    noise from each aircraft arrival.19 Low engine power settings during CDA
    reduce fuel use, and the aircraft is generally higher than in a stepped
    approach. Much of the noise is from the turbofan assembly and is tonal in
    quality. People tend to find tonal noise more annoying at a given level.

4C.20 Future changes to international air traffic management include integrated
‘gate to gate’ operational systems, and ‘area navigation’ procedures
(RNAV, see glossary), with the prospect of adjustments to the present
structure of departure routes. Reducing the need for entering one of the
four ‘holding stacks’ around London, would not necessarily reduce the
need for integrating different traffic streams for final approach. Airspace
management is the responsibility of the Civil Aviation Authority/National
Air Traffic Services. Air traffic controllers use a variety of rules, procedures
and practices designed to ensure the safe and expeditious separation and
sequencing of aircraft. The structure of controlled airspace over London
has been built up over a long period. Any major redesign would have
widespread ‘knock on’ implications. Aircraft positioning for approach to
Heathrow are not necessarily required to enter a holding pattern, or be
constrained to a particular standard arrival route. Aircraft may, depending
on air traffic conditions, weather conditions and other factors, be directed
and sequenced to final approach in a variety of ways.

4C.21 Aircraft manoeuvre over many parts of London, outside the most-affected
areas in south-west London. Many of these are manoeuvring across south
or north London to join the glideslope on their approach to Heathrow
Airport. There are also increasing movements to and from other airports in
and around London. It may not always be clear to people in Tower
Hamlets or Greenwich, for example, whether the aircraft they see are
using Heathrow, London City or other airports. Air traffic control
arrangements change only infrequently. This makes it even more
important that as complete as possible an understanding of the noise and
other environmental effects is established, so that no opportunity to
improve the situation is missed.

4C.22 Take-offs have traditionally been more of a noise problem than
landings. The balance of advantage may shift as aircraft technologies
change. This aspect of current arrangements requires periodic review.

4C.39 Consultative committees provide for communication and consultation
between airports and affected communities. They provide regular
opportunities for all parties to monitor and exchange information, and to
review noise management alongside other issues, as circumstances change.
Box 47: Airport Consultative Committees
The Heathrow Airport Consultative Committee is a statutory body including
representatives of local residents, local authorities for areas both inside and
outside Greater London35, specialist groups, environmental groups and
industry bodies. The Heathrow Area Transport Forum plays an important
role in relation to surface access. A Noise and Track Keeping Working Group
studies noise reduction methods and monitors issues such as aircraft
adherence to designated routes, night engine testing, and ground noise.
Annual noise reports are published, beginning with 2000/2001, including
data on air transport movements, passenger figures, contour areas and
numbers of residents contained within them, CDA achievement, night quota
use, track keeping and infringements. Other Airport Consultative
Committees, such as at London City, perform a similar function.

4C.41 One of the problems with the published LAeq 16 hour aircraft noise contours is
that they are being used for purposes for which they are not suitable. They
reduce a complex series of events to a single figure, which is useful for
planning, summary trends and other purposes. However, despite published
caveats, people can interpret the 57 contour as implying that people
outside it should not notice aircraft at all. In fact, a proportion of people
are annoyed at lower levels of aircraft noise. The contours only give a
generalised long term indication of overall noise energy. Particularly when
they are choosing where to live, people may want to know how many
aircraft are likely to fly over, and at what times, including whether there
are regular periods of respite. In the case of roads, railways and many other
noise sources, the physical presence of infrastructure in the vicinity of a
house may alert a buyer, while aircraft may not be using a relevant
flightpath when buyers inspect. Better information on the probability of
overflight could also be useful when people are visiting historic parks or
gardens, nature reserves, or making other plans for open air activity.

4C.43 Heathrow Airport is the largest air freight facility in the UK, handling
some 56% of all UK air cargo in 2002.1 The vast majority of air freight
using Heathrow is carried in the holds of passenger aircraft. Freight-only
aircraft are concentrated at Stansted. Luton is a centre for night courier
operations. Air freight shipping and forwarding is a major activity in the
Heathrow area, which assembles air freight consignments for other
airports. The Mayor’s Air Quality Strategy has highlighted air quality issues
in the Heathrow area, and seeks to encourage lower emission vehicles.
The use of the quietest available vehicles for inter-airport and other night
movement of freight needs to be encouraged. The Heathrow Joint
Distribution Centre for airport retailing has reduced the number of service
delivery vehicles entering the airport. This is an important initiative with
wider implications for demonstrating how load consolidation can reduce
the environmental impact, including noise, of freight vehicles.

Noise – points of reference in decibels (dBAs)

10Normal breathing
40Quiet residential area or a semi-rural location
42* Airplane Transitions above 20,000 feet.
45-60* Airplane Arrivals between 7,000 and 14,000 feet.
60Normal conversation
60-70* Airplane Arrivals below 7,000 feet.
70Road & Street traffic
85Heavy traffic
90Heavy lorries
110Car horn
140* Airplane taking off
* Typically the sound from an Aircraft is audible for a period of 40-50 seconds.

A difference of 10 decibels is a doubling of loudness.
A difference of 3 decibels is a doubling of sound Intensity.
Baseline – World Health Organisation of 45 dB.

Investors back extra runway at Gatwick as expansion would add 90 extra flights per day, but what does it really mean in terms of flight events, noise and emissions?

The story of 90 extra flights for Gatwick airport was published by HARRIET DENNYS FOR FINANCIAL MAIL ON SUNDAY PUBLISHED: 22:21, 2 January 2021 | UPDATED: 10:02, 3 January 2021

90 extra flights per day is assumed to mean 90 Departures. 90 Departures implies 90 additional Arrivals. 90 Arrivals equates to 540 flight Arrival flight events due to stacking and zigzagging through UK airspace prior to landing.

Assuming 50% the 90 extra flights are destined for UK airports this equates another 315 Departure and Arrival flight events.

In total 90 extra flights equates to 945 flight events per day with each flight event being associated with airspace noise and emissions.

The number of persons benefiting from the 90 fights will be approximately 18k. Based on current legislation the number of UK citizens impacted by increased noise and emissions will be 30+ million per everyday, 7 days a week.

The UK airspace is lawless in terms of noise and emissions as there are no legal controls or penalties in this area*.

(please use the twitter account @RichardHerson to comment on this article)

* As stated by the UK CAA. I.e. Aircraft noise is not currently a statutory nuisance in the UK. It is not covered by the Environmental Protection Act 1990 or the Noise Act 1996. This means that local authorities do not have the legal power to take action on matters of aircraft noise, and nor does the CAA have the legal power to prevent aircraft flying over a particular location or at a particular time for environmental reasons.

What is the impact of an aircraft pass-by?

It is all about noise. Health impacts are mainly focusing on the night-time (sleep disturbance), Visual aspect is not recognised as annoying as such.

Noise is a combination of aircraft type and engine configuration (same types of aircraft can be equipped with different engines).

Noise is a wave, so no displacement of air, just a pressure wave.

Ornaments and vibrating windows are related to the interactions between the sound wave and the object it falls on.

If the frequency of the sound matches the natural frequency of the object, then it starts to vibrate.

You can compare it with pushing a swing, if you push in the matching frequency, the swing will gain amplitude, that’s the vibrating window.

Vibrating things start to emit sound by themselves and is called ‘secondary sound’.

Aircraft Traffic Assessments – Facts and Stats

The following stats have been created by combining multiple individual Assessments to provide an understanding of what’s actually happening in our UK airspace by postcode area.

Stat 1.
Based on 170+ individual postcode flight Assessments from across the UK;

46% of ‘pass-by’ flights under 20k feet occur at weekends or Mon-Fri (7.00pm to 6.00am) I.e. they can regularly be heard during family quiet times within the home.

Get involved in your airspace, sponsor an Assessment.

Stat 2.
Based on 170+ individual postcode flight Assessments from across the UK;

The average time for a single flight to navigate through a local postcode airspace is 21 seconds. During this time our homes are subjected to sound waves i.e. noise and vibration and secondary noises.

Get involved and start controlling your airspace. Sponsor an Assessment.

Stat 3.
Based on 170+ individual postcode flight Assessments from across the UK;

Flight activity at the major UK airports is distributed evenly over a 19 hour day (6:00 to 24:00) and also evenly across the 7 days . There is no rush hour it’s just continuous.

Get involved and start controlling your airspace. Sponsor an Assessment.

Making sense of the Aircraft Traffic Assessment Scorecard.

This article explains how to make sense of the information contained within the Aircraft Traffic Assessment Scorecard, both for the Full and 31 Day assessments.

Date of SurveyFor the 31 Day Scorecard the date represents the end date and time for the survey. The start date and time is calculated 31 days earlier.

Whereas for the Full Scorecard the date represents when the survey was requested and is for information only.
LocationIs the identifier for the location being surveyed.
Baseline geo-coordinatesThe geo-coordinates, Lat & Long, are used to define the centre of the 1 mile Assessment airspace bubble. Typically this is the actual location of the point-of-interest.
Survey TypeDescribes the type of assessment survey being reported. The full survey analyses 93 days of flight events based on 2019. The 31 Day survey uses the actual survey date, see above.
Assessment disruption bandThe Assessment band category e.g. FREQUENT, OCCASIONAL, VERY HIGH etc. This is an important measure.
Assessment disruption valueThe actual Assessment value. Useful for gaining an understanding where the location sits within the disruption band i.e. bottom, middle or top. This is an important measure.
Assessment descriptionA description that attempts to relate the Assessment to an equivalent road noise.
Band range.Shows the lower and upper levels for the Assessment band. Designed to be used in conjunction with the Assessment disruption value. This is important data.
Flight holding stack identified?If a fight holding stack is identified the returned value is ‘YES’. Meaning planes will be held in a holding loop at between 7,000-12,000 feet. Multiple planes can exist in the stack at the same time and the planes are in “fly” mode i.e. not gliding.
Count of ALL flightsThe total number of flights that occurred within the Assessment postcode for the entire period and then averaged by day and by hour. All flights are included, however those above 35,000 feet will have little impact.
Flights above 26,000 feetThe total number of flights that occurred above 26,000 feet within the Assessment airspace. Flights between 26,000 and 35,000 feet can be heard from the ground. Flights at this height are someway from the destination airport.
Flights between 16,000 and 26,000 feetThe total number of flights that occurred between 16,000 and 26,000 feet within the assessment period. Flights at this height implies the area is being overflown and the airspace is being used by 1 or more airports.
Flights between 13,000 and 16,000 feetAs above but between 13,000 and 16,000 feet. However, the planes will be clearly heard from the ground and will be clearly visible.
Flights between 7,000 and 12,000 feetAs above but between 7,000 and 12,000 feet. This is the height that most planes are held within holding stacks prior to landing.
Flights between 6,000 and 7,000 feetThe total number of flights that occurred between 6,000 and 7,000 feet. Planes leave their holding position at this height ready for final descent.
Flights between 5,000 and 6,000 feet
Flights between 4,000 and 5,000 feet
Flights between 3,000 and 4,000 feet
The total number of flights that occurred between 6,000 and 3,000 feet. At this height it implies the planes have recently departed or are about to land. Both scenarios will be relatively noisy.
Flights below 3,000 feetSee above but very visual too.
4 or more flights per hourThe count of occurrences where 4 or more flights occurred within a single 60 minute period. For a flight to qualify it has to be below 26,000 feet. 4 flights within 60 minutes averages a flight every 15 minutes which gives the impression of a continuous background noise/rumble.
9 or more flights per hourThe count of occurrences where 9 or more flights occurred within a single 60 minute period. For a flight to qualify it has to be below 26,000 feet. 9 flights within 60 minutes averages a flight every 7 minutes which gives the impression of a continuous background noise/rumble.
Departures between 1,500 and 15,000
The total number of departures between 1,500 and 15,000 feet within the assessment period. Departures tend to be noisier than Arrivals.
Hours between 0:00 AM and 7:59 AMThe 2 values shown represent; 1) count of aircraft movements that occurred within a one hour period for the duration of the Assessment [93 days for the Full Assessment and 31 for the Latest Assessment], and 2) the average occurrences per day per hourly period.

Planes below 26,000 feet occurring these times are very likely to disturb sleep patterns.
Hours between 8:00 AM and 9:59 PMAs above but also includes a 3rd value that represents the average count per hour within the 14 hour period (8:00am – 10:00pm)
Hours between 10:00 PM and 11:59 PMAs above. Planes below 26,000 feet occurring these times are very likely to disturb sleep patterns.
Time in seconds an aircraft existed in the
Airspace Bubble
The average time in seconds it takes for a flight to travel through your airspace bubble which as a radius of 1 mile. The longer the period the greater will be the level of disruption.
Altitude for all flightsThe average altitude for all flights passing through the area.
Altitude of departures between 1,500 and
15,000 feet
The average altitude for Departing flights that are between 1,500 and 15,000 feet.
Altitude of flights below 20,000 feetThe average altitude for all flights passing through the area that are below 20,000 feet.
Number of disruptions per dayThe average daily number of disruptions to expect. Note: please see our article about how the disruption is calculated. This is an important measure.
Percentage of disruptions that occur
Out-Of-Hours and at Weekends
The percentage of disruptions that occur at weekends and/or after hours.
Distance from baseline in milesThe average distance the disruptive flight was from the baseline co-ordinates, in fractions of a mile
Scale of regular disruptionPrior to making your final decision we recommend you validate our Assessment by an actual site visit. The scorecard includes a list of 10 dates and times when the disruptions are most likely to occur.
Period and Frequency. E.g. Sunday @ 6:00 – 11 time(s) in 13 weeks. Approx:14 flight events.

This example states that on Sunday mornings between 6:00am – 6:59am there is regularly* 14 flights over the postcode area.

* 11 occurrences within the 13 week or 4 week Assessment period.